Note: this market is not referring to the material known as LK-99, claimed to be a room-temperature, ambient pressure superconductor, discovered by a South Korean group. This is an entirely separate claim.
Taj Quantum claim to have invented a room temperature, ambient pressure superconductor.
On July 25th, 2023, they were granted a patent 17/249,094 | 545074945NP:ABOVE ROOM TEMPERATURE TYPE II SUPERCONDUCTOR
The inventors are listed as John A. Wood, Bethlehem, PENNSYLVANIA (US) and
Paul J. Lilly, Howey In The Hills, FLORIDA (US)
They've tweeted about it here:
Wherein they clarify that they are indeed claiming it to be superconducting at ambient pressure as well as room temperature (the patent does not emphasise the ambient-pressure part).
Edit: and they have made a press release:
https://tajquantum.com/art-t2sc/
Did they invent such a superconductor?
This market resolves YES or NO on credible reports of convincing empirical tests establishing that the material as described in this patent either does or does not exhibit superconductivity at room temperature and ambient pressure.
Ideally this will take the form of peer-reviewed scientific publications that establish a consensus view, but other convincing evidence will suffice if it is to a high standard. I will not resolve immediately upon early evidence, but wait (possibly a substantial time) for a consensus view to emerge among superconductivity researchers, in case early attempts are flawed or controversial.
Alternately the market resolves NO immediately if the inventors retract their claim that the material is a superconductor.
The market resolves NO at the beginning of 2030 if there has been no evidence either way, or the close date will be extended if there is some evidence that is the subject ongoing debate at that time.
It does not matter whether other claims made about the material are true - for example whether it is specifically a type II superconductor (as claimed), or not. It only matters to this market whether the material exhibits superconductivity at room temperature and pressure.
Related questions
As you scroll through their recent post, it becomes more and more obviously LLM generated (and/or they got lazier editing it).
A favorite excerpt of mine:
What is the purpose of developing superconductor wire?
The development of a superconductor wire presents numerous potential benefits and practical uses owing to the distinctive characteristics exhibited by superconducting materials. There exist several primary motivations for the development of superconductor wire:
The concept of zero electrical resistance refers to the phenomenon when a material or system exhibits no opposition to the flow of electric current.
Superconductor wires has the remarkable property of exhibiting absolute zero electrical resistance, hence enabling the transmission of electrical current without any dissipation of energy. This phenomenon stands in stark contrast to the behavior of traditional wires, which consistently exhibit resistance and hence dissipate energy in the form of heat. The aforementioned characteristic is greatly sought after in terms of enhancing energy efficiency.
The concept of high current density refers to the condition in which a significant amount of electric current is flowing through a certain area or volume.
Superconductors possess the capability to transport significantly higher currents compared to conventional conductors of equivalent dimensions. This phenomenon is commonly referred to as high current density. Therefore, the utilization of superconductor wires enables the generation of robust magnetic fields without the requirement of bulky and weighty wire coils.
@RobertCousineau Is it just me, or have LLMs gotten worse at correct grammar? Chat-GPT used to almost always write (what most English professors would consider to be) “perfect grammar,” but now I’m seeing it make some mistakes. E.G. it should be “superconductors wires have,” not “…wires has.”
@nottelling2ccc I don’t think ChatGPT would make that mistake. They probably asked it in another language and then translated it.
@zzlk Sorry. Having seen how the incentives are playing out on the other markets based on when they resolve, I would have picked a shorter period. Better not change it now though.
The guy claiming this invention has a youtube channel where he posts (as recently as today) AI generated finance videos, tesla FSD videos, and hot sauce reviews.
I dunno about you but if I'd discovered a RTSC i'd probably quit doing the AI grifting and focus on that.
(verification: youtube channel has the same name as the Paul Lilley mentioned in the press release posted by taj quantum. A google search for '"paul lilly" "taj quantum"' brings up this linkedin profile. The profile picture on the linkedin is the same picture as on the patreon page linked on the youtube channel's about page.)
Another website of his - https://lillyglobalconsulting.com/
this website also has a RTSC claim which is listed second on their list of acheivements, under "COVID-19 Pandemic Support Services".
The RTSC claim has been there since at least July 2021 -
https://web.archive.org/web/20210701003621/https://lillyglobalconsulting.com/
@vlad Huh, that looks like it might be fully floating! Nothing we know of can do that other than type II superconductors. Either it's outright fraud, or that's a superconductor. (Edit: or new physics)
Now let's see a video to help figure out which one...
@chrisjbillington The fact that they're leaving it open to speculation by uploading a single photo when they have apparently been sitting on this for 2 years makes it very suspicious. Why? Why not take a single iPhone video? Why not upload a photo where it's clear that it's at room temp and atmospheric pressure? At least the LK-99 people took a video and put a hand in it.
@HenkPoley They posted a much higher res photo on twitter: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F2Y13rnXwAAJg-p?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
It doesn't really look like anything between them to me. (I still don't think this is real)
I have been a strong yes advocate for the main superconductor bet. I still have very good reasons to believe that the main superconductor will work out (mostly from authorial motivations)
This one is an absolute joke. Any 'superconductor research' that is associated with 'blockchains' is straight to the trash.
@QuantumObserver the ideas are unrelated though, they are using some weird wetted graphene approach
@CodeandSolder This is true, but both are (claimed to be) 1D superconductors. 1D Superconductor Summer?
superconductivity at room temperature and ambient pressure. That is, whether or not it can or cannot conduct current with zero electrical resistance.
Maybe use the term "ideal conductor" over "superconductor"?
@Mira I was unaware the two terms were not equivalent, I was intending for that to be a definition of superconductivity. Thanks for pointing that out it's not. My aim with making the resolution criteria narrow like that was to absolve the patent of being wrong about specific details such as what type of superconductor it is - but I do only want to resolve YES if it's actually a superconductor, however that is actually defined. I'll reword.
@chrisjbillington Traditionally, uperconductors are generally required to demonstrate
Zero resistivity below Tc
The Meissner effect at Tc
A phase change at Tc
Seems like an obvious grift trying to ride on the Presently Occurring Events, however
> This market resolves YES or NO on credible reports of convincing empirical tests that establishing either that the material as described in this patent is or is not capable of superconductivity at room temperature and ambient pressure.
.. may not happen if no one takes it seriously enough to try :')
@BarrDetwix Indeed. If nobody takes it seriously enough to try (which itself is evidence against), we resolve NO at start of 2030.
About it being a grift, I don't think so. It looks like they applied for the patent a long time ago (possibly in 2021?) and got it granted on Jul 25th - basically same day (unsure about timezones) LK-99 was first blowing up. Coincidence? Patent office working overtime to get this one in particular granted? Don't know. But they at least began the process some time prior.
@chrisjbillington Taj Quantum applied in 21 February 2020 even.
(Note that them being a 'blockchain' company points to a scam.)