WilliamKiely avatar
resolved May 22
Will LessWrong pay users $1 for each Good Heart Token they earn?
Resolved
YES

šŸ… Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1
Unknown user avatar
Gurkenglas
į¹€27
2
Unknown user avatar
Undox
į¹€17
3
Unknown user avatar
William Kiely
į¹€12
4
Unknown user avatar
Martin Randall
į¹€0

šŸ’¬ Proven correct

WilliamKiely avatar
William Kiely
bought į¹€10 of YES
Since the market hasn't seemed to reach a consensus yet I took a look at the original post again. The fact that they appear to actually be serious about banning voting rings (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mz3hwS4c9bc9EHAm9/replacing-karma-with-good-heart-tokens-worth-usd1?commentId=mmb8JK6p9mj8ksLtT) makes me think they might actually pay people out per the stated post. It could also be that they're just trying hard to act serious, so I'm only buying enough to get the market up to 58%.

šŸ’ø Best bet

A trader bought į¹€20 YES from 10% to 83%
Undox made į¹€25!
Sort by:
WilliamKiely avatar
William Kiely
bought į¹€10 of YES
Since the market hasn't seemed to reach a consensus yet I took a look at the original post again. The fact that they appear to actually be serious about banning voting rings (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mz3hwS4c9bc9EHAm9/replacing-karma-with-good-heart-tokens-worth-usd1?commentId=mmb8JK6p9mj8ksLtT) makes me think they might actually pay people out per the stated post. It could also be that they're just trying hard to act serious, so I'm only buying enough to get the market up to 58%.
Conflux avatar
Conflux
bought į¹€20 of NO
Logistics of payouts are difficult. Iā€™m skeptical.
WilliamKiely avatar
William Kiely
bought į¹€1 of NO
I assumed it was probably an April Fool's joke and wouldn't actually pay out, but it sounds like the market disagrees currently. Interesting.
WilliamKiely avatar
William Kiely
bought į¹€1 of YES
Re: "This doesn't automatically resolve NO because of the "The minimum number of tokens to be exchanged is 25." clause, right? Right?" Correct. If someone gets >$25 for getting >25 Good Heart Tokens, this will resolve positively. The intent of this question is basically just to evaluate whether it's an April Fool's joke that won't actually pay out real money (negative resolution) or whether it's legitimate (positive resolution).
Gurkenglas avatar
Gurkenglas
bought į¹€30 of YES
This doesn't automatically resolve NO because of the "The minimum number of tokens to be exchanged is 25." clause, right? Right?