Resolution criteria
This resolves on Zelensky’s first on‑camera joint appearance with U.S. President Trump in Washington, D.C., on August 18, 2025 (arrival/photo‑op/press availability). The event’s occurrence is documented by Reuters/AP/Kyiv Independent. (reuters.com, apnews.com, kyivindependent.com)
Classification (single-winner precedence):
Wears suit = coordinated tailored jacket and matching trousers with a collared shirt (tie optional) → “Wears suit” resolves Yes; all others No.
Else, if wearing military/tactical attire (e.g., olive/black crew/sweatshirt or tee with trident/“Ukraine,” cargo pants/boots; no tailored suit jacket) and is publicly scolded → “Wears military fatigues, gets scolded by politician/journalist” resolves Yes; others No.
Else, if wearing military/tactical attire and not publicly scolded → “Wears military fatigues, does not get scolded” resolves Yes; others No.
“Publicly scolded” = an on‑record rebuke about Zelensky’s attire by a politician or credentialed journalist during Aug 18 (00:00–23:59 ET) at/adjacent to the summit, evidenced by primary video/transcript or reports from at least two reputable outlets (e.g., Reuters, AP, BBC, NYT, WaPo, AFP, C‑SPAN).
If multiple outfits on Aug 18, use the earliest joint appearance with Trump. If no public on‑camera appearance that day, resolve N/A.
Verification sources to check: Reuters event/story/photos, AP report/photos, C‑SPAN/White House feeds, and official posts from the Presidential Offices.
Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/trump-tells-ukraine-give-up-nato-crimea-ahead-zelenskiy-meeting-2025-08-18/ (reuters.com)
AP: https://apnews.com/article/d0ad768453210db23fe4b108f7b87135 (apnews.com)
C‑SPAN: https://www.c-span.org/
White House Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse
President of Ukraine (X): https://twitter.com/ZelenskyyUa
Background
Zelensky meets Trump (with European leaders expected) in Washington on Aug 18, 2025, following Trump’s Alaska meeting with Putin; the Washington session is the focal public appearance for this market. (reuters.com, apnews.com, kyivindependent.com)
His wartime wardrobe has drawn recurring media and political attention; he has recently shifted to more formal black, suit‑like looks without a tie after prior criticism. (reuters.com)
Earlier this year, attire critiques reached the Oval Office and broader press, illustrating what counts as public “scolding” for this market’s purposes. (bbc.com)
Considerations
Borderline cases (e.g., dark jacket with non‑matching trousers): if it’s not a coordinated suit, treat as non‑suit; if top is clearly tactical/insignia crew/sweatshirt, treat as military style.
Only on‑site, on‑record rebukes by politicians or credentialed journalists qualify as “scolding”; social‑media commentary or pundit segments outside the event do not.
Update 2025-08-18 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - In the case of a formal jacket without matching trousers:
If not scolded, will resolve PARTIAL, splitting between “Wears suit” and the appropriate no‑suit, not scolded outcome based on the creator’s judgment of how “suity” it looks (e.g., ~50/50).
If scolded for the attire, will resolve to the no‑suit, got scolded outcome.
🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ61 | |
| 2 | Ṁ60 | |
| 3 | Ṁ59 | |
| 4 | Ṁ38 | |
| 5 | Ṁ26 |
People are also trading

Apparently Trump said something nice to Zelensky (still waiting for it to be published officially) about his clothes so I am inclined to resolve it to "Wears suit". I will wait for confirmation of this claim; anyway we need to wait for the meeting (and press conference after it) to finish - maybe he will get scolded anyways.
@VonGadke https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/trump-zelensky-meeting-russia-ukraine/card/trump-compliments-zelensky-s-suit-ZsZRs1uG0sDSjnIBcQRn

bloody paywall prevents me from reading what happened next, would be glad for help from @traders in this regard
How would it resolve in case of a formal jacket but not full suit?
@ElectricCopperMountain IF he was not scolded for that - percentage depending on my judgement how 'suity" it looks (e.g. 50% for suit, 50% for no suit, not scolded) ELSE no suit, got scolded
