Resolves YES if the void is present at the end of r/place and is at least 2601 pixels large (That is a pretty small area).
The void has previously appeared on the canvas and was usually black and just empty of everything. Sometimes there was also some kind of horror monster in the void. It doesn't have to be black for this to resolve YES if there is some kind of blue void that is still clearly a void and just consuming the canvas it counts as well. The 2601 pixels should be connected in one place or almoast connected. If there are 5 tiny voids spread ocross the canvas it doesn't count.
1,000
3.00@jojomonsta See the long comment on that post you’ve linked. That is not as per the resolution criteria “clearly a void and just consuming the canvas” or “just empty of everything”, IMHO.
@TamarSpoerri its says in the description that a blue void that is just consuming the canvas is also a void but it doesn't say that all voids are just consuming the canvas. Also it's true that it "was usually just empty of everything" but this also is not a necessary condition
@TamarSpoerri It was a) repeatedly described as a void in posts on r/place, b) made by the same community which made the other voids, r/theswarm, which describes itself as follows "The Swarm is a group that would like to consume the r/place canvas by covering it in black, and as such restore glory to the Void." c) was explicitly stated that it may also contain horror monsters / did not have to be empty of everything, and d) didn't have to be perfectly connected, so even if you want to count just the black pixels, it still almost certainly fits the bill.
@TamarSpoerri I agree, this structure wasn't especially void like, what convinced me to resolve yes was watching the way it formed. If you look at the history of the canvas you can see how the black mass just spreads out like some liquid.
@TamarSpoerri Thanks for the review, I will try to specify the resolution criteria of my future markts more clearly.
