Will the number of published papers on LK-99 or similar derivatives exceed 300 before 2027?
20
1kṀ4877
2027
3%
chance

A paper counts as anything published in good faith by researchers who did actual work.

The papers must be published through a medium historically used for scienific papers.

Duplicates or re-uploads of the same paper don't count.

For something to count as a "similar derivitive" it must at least reference one of the original LK-99 papers.

"Meta Papers" about the reaction to LK-99 don't count. It must be on the topic of superconductivity or something similar.


I'm making this question because I wonder even if LK-99 is found to likely not be a RTAP superconductor whether researchers will continue to study it anyway. Obviously if it is a RTAP SC then this should resolve yes anyway.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!


Sort by:

300 papers before 2027 is almost 2 per week. This would make it a large enough subfield that you'd have LK-99 conferences and symposia. I just don't see this as within the bounds of reasonable expectation unless LK-99 is a RTAP superconductor.

Another way to think about it is that if a paper gets 300 citations in 3 years, that's pretty good already; but most citations are not directly about using the materials, but "about the materials" or "about the field" (often, very nonspecific), so 300 papers on LK-99 would mean at least 1,000 citations in 3 years (likely closer to 3,000), which would be extraordinary and put it on track to make it one of the highest cited papers ever (the 100th most cited paper ever is on the order of 12,000 citations: https://www.nature.com/news/the-top-100-papers-1.16224)

So, this becomes another "is LK-99 a superconductor?" market and it is predicting a much higher probability than the others

I'm assuming LK-99 is a cold fusion type of situation, so I think that even if there are some cool properties to the material, it'll get stigmatized as crank-affiliated. Eventually this stigma might wear off if the properties really are interesting, but 2027 is too soon.

1y

Very bullish on this, it's a novel material with weird properties.

What is this?

What is Manifold?
Manifold is the world's largest social prediction market.
Get accurate real-time odds on politics, tech, sports, and more.
Or create your own play-money betting market on any question you care about.
Are our predictions accurate?
Yes! Manifold is very well calibrated, with forecasts on average within 4 percentage points of the true probability. Our probabilities are created by users buying and selling shares of a market.
In the 2022 US midterm elections, we outperformed all other prediction market platforms and were in line with FiveThirtyEight’s performance. Many people who don't like betting still use Manifold to get reliable news.
ṀWhy use play money?
Mana (Ṁ) is the play-money currency used to bet on Manifold. It cannot be converted to cash. All users start with Ṁ1,000 for free.
Play money means it's much easier for anyone anywhere in the world to get started and try out forecasting without any risk. It also means there's more freedom to create and bet on any type of question.
© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy