Meta has long been known to be ham-fisted with censorship on its platforms, preferring a stale "family-friendly" approach, even though a fundamental userbase of Instagram is the sex worker community. In contrast, Twitter has historically been a bastion for political dissidents, sex workers, and breaking news stories that sometimes come with highly uncomfortable footage. Will these needs of people leaving Twitter be filled by Threads? Will Meta have a strong policy against it from the outset? Or might Meta lure them in before closing the trap? How will users feel about Threads once these policies are known?
Resolves YES if controversy, frustration, or outrage about Thread's content policies spawns article(s) in any major English-language publication (NYT, BBC, AP, etc.) within three months, except Opinion section stuff.
Otherwise resolves NO after close.
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ1,414 | |
2 | Ṁ226 | |
3 | Ṁ49 | |
4 | Ṁ42 | |
5 | Ṁ42 |