Will "Some background for reasoning about dual-use ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
Basic
0
Feb 1
14%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2023 Review resolves in February 2025.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Some background for reasoning about dual-use alignment research is one of the top fifty posts of the 2023 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000and
3.00
1,0003.00Related questions
Related questions
Will "Towards Developmental Interpretability" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
73% chance
Will "What Goes Without Saying" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
11% chance
Will "Against LLM Reductionism" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
21% chance
Will "Attitudes about Applied Rationality" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
43% chance
Will "re: Yudkowsky on biological materials" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
16% chance
Will "Skills from a year of Purposeful Rationality ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
22% chance
Will "Davidad's Bold Plan for Alignment: An In-Dept..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "What I would do if I wasn’t at ARC Evals" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "Priors and Prejudice" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
19% chance
Will "Lsusr's Rationality Dojo" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
17% chance