Will "Some background for reasoning about dual-use ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
0
Ṁ100resolved Feb 11
Resolved
NO1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2023 Review resolves in February 2025.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Some background for reasoning about dual-use alignment research is one of the top fifty posts of the 2023 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000People are also trading
Related questions
Will "The title is reasonable" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
6% chance
Will "Some articles in “International Security” tha..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "The Most Common Bad Argument In These Parts" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
25% chance
Will "Good Research Takes are Not Sufficient for Go..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
12% chance
Will "The Best Reference Works for Every Subject" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Reasons for and against working on technical ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Surprising LLM reasoning failures make me thi..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
16% chance
Will "Precedents for the Unprecedented: Historical ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2026 Annual Review?
15% chance
Will "Unexpected Things that are People" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
24% chance
Will "Obstacles in ARC's agenda: Finding explanations" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance