Will "Explaining grokking through circuit efficiency" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2023 Annual Review?
1
Ṁ1kṀ350resolved Feb 11
Resolved
NO1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
As part of LessWrong's Annual Review, the community nominates, writes reviews, and votes on the most valuable posts. Posts are reviewable once they have been up for at least 12 months, and the 2023 Review resolves in February 2025.
This market will resolve to 100% if the post Explaining grokking through circuit efficiency is one of the top fifty posts of the 2023 Review, and 0% otherwise. The market was initialized to 14%.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ44 |
People are also trading
Related questions
Will "Weight-Sparse Circuits May Be Interpretable Y..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2026 Annual Review?
9% chance
Will "Are We In A Coding Overhang?" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "The Boring Part of Bell Labs" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
19% chance
Will "Optimizing The Final Output Can Obfuscate CoT..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "It's hard to make scheming evals look realist..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Scalable End-to-End Interpretability" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Towards Alignment Auditing as a Numbers-Go-Up..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Making deals with early schemers" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
23% chance
Will "How To Become A Mechanistic Interpretability ..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
50% chance
Will "Weird Generalization & Inductive Backdoors" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2025 Annual Review?
13% chance