If RFK and Vance went on Rogan, who would perform better, who would you learn more from and who would you vote for?
6
Jan 1
RFK / RFK / RFK
RFK / RFK / Vance
RFK / Vance / RFK
RFK / Vance / Vance
Vance / RFK / RFK
Vance / RFK / Vance
Vance / Vance / RFK
Vance / Vance / Vance

For the purpose of this thought experiment, assume that someone paid Trump a large sum of Bitcoin to drop out of the race and endorse Vance, Trump accepts, the democrats endorse RFK and RFK and Vance are the two clear options for the general election.

Then, they decide to go on Joe Rogan instead of having a formal debate. They charitably discuss their positions on many specific issues and Joe does a great job of identifying where they actually disagree. They spend over 6 hrs discussing the specifics of AI, crypto, national security and what the best and worst case scenarios look like that may evolve over the next 10 years.

Joe has questions prepared and is prepped by Eliezer Yudkowsky, Vitalik Buterin and Steven Greer.

Assume this happened.

What would be true for you personally (not what you would expect of others)?

If you wouldn't watch the podcast OR wouldn't vote, assuming they were the front runners and the podcast did occur, please don't vote on this poll.

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00
Sort by:
© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules