🏅 Top traders

I didnt even remember this market because no one is making comments

Well, the idea didn't work as expected.

I thought it would be profitable to make limit orders at 89% and breaking the move by moving piece elsewhere to make the first one resolve NO, and get 900% income. But such strategies would need more people to play.

Also the procedure with random time of my entrance did not leave time for people to make such limit orders.

@KongoLandwalker Yeah, that assumes warring. But if you assume warring then it makes no sense to try to push moves through as 91% is too high to defend. So you don't take part.

So the effect was to encourage other things like considering co-operation or trolling or just not taking part. So became quiet enough to push through a win

Е2-е3 was N/A by my mistake

@KongoLandwalker huh why can't king move forward? It was created today after Ke1-e2

@ChristopherRandles my mistake. I thought that was an intention to write a pawn move, which was not possible already, to get a guaranteed No resolution.

I allowed not writing the piece type, but then it backfired and confused me.

@KongoLandwalker Are you able to unresolve?

@ChristopherRandles i tried, it writes "resolution happened mlre than 10m ago"

@ChristopherRandles i will make the piece notion obligatory

@KongoLandwalker Unresolved for ya with mod powers

@KongoLandwalker Good call. It is not like I can do anything special by not writing the piece, you can't ever get two pieces of the same color to occupy the same square continuously

@KongoLandwalker
Yes unlikely to be able to place another piece from same side on the source square before you realise the move has become impossible.

What I am wondering now is if the source square should be optional. So if I want Kf3 whether or not Ke2-e3 has happened I just submit White Kf3 whereas if I don't want to play that after Ke2-e3 then I specify White Ke2-f3

@ChristopherRandles no, taking into account my fails at managing previous gamemarkets that is very likely, that i miss something.

@SavioMak Does this mean war? I was thinking co-operation made more sense.

@ChristopherRandles Trolling is more fun, I'm not exqctly fighting for white

@SavioMak I didn't mean a black v white war but a better v better war for mana. But if it is trolling then umm hmm not sure what to do about that

@ChristopherRandles not much fun in cooperating to farm subsidy imo

@ChristopherRandles I am happy to spend mana trolling though, so don't feel bad taking this like a war and buy though the limit order :)

@SavioMak Re not much fun. Fair enough I won't take it as declaration of war/personal. But if I take that view then I should try to troll your trolls by trying to push through c8 to d7 or something?

Or I could still try to be more co-operative and offer deals e.g. I will support your e8 d7 if you will then drop your opposition and limit bid against e7-e5.

@ChristopherRandles do whatever you want to do!

I do not resolve more than 1 answer per visit.

There is a minimum 1h cooldown between my visits, ie moves.

Are you saying at most 1 resolution per hour, or at most 1 YES resolution per hour? Moves and visits are different because of NO resolution.

@SavioMak 1h cooldown between any resolutions. The fact about max 1move/hour is a consequence of that.

@KongoLandwalker Then what is the priority for resolutions if multiple can be resolved?

@SavioMak multiple answers can't be resolved YES at a single visit. If more than 1 have 90%, the highest resolves, and others are checked whether they are still possible. It is possible that one move proposal with 95% will make another one with 92% impossible by blocking the path.

Only NO resolutions can happen more than one at a time.

@KongoLandwalker Ok so you may resolve multiple NO + 1 YES at the same time, got it. I hope you realized that you said something else in the description though, you should change that

I do not resolve more than 1 answer per visit.

@SavioMak thanks for pointing. Changed to "... more than one successful move per visit".

@KongoLandwalker Thanks for clarifications

@KongoLandwalker It is a weird game, I suggest as I struggle to think of something relevant or useful to say.