Resolves to No if, as of January 1, she has vacated her position for any reason. If her co-chair steps down, leaving her as sole chair, resolves to Yes.
Update 2025-12-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - Resolution: Yes
Market Extension: The market closing date has been extended by one day to address any confusion.
1,000
3.00🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ220 | |
| 2 | Ṁ49 | |
| 3 | Ṁ32 | |
| 4 | Ṁ31 |
@traders I intend to resolve this "NO" within the next couple of days unless someone objects and provides good cause to resolve otherwise. My reasoning is that although L Trump announced her intention to resign the post in December, she said she would formally do so at the next meeting.
I can't find information on when that meeting is to be, or was, held. But the RNC home page still lists her as co-chair. I think that's sufficient evidence that she formally retains the post today, which would cause this question to resolve "NO."
@Hyperlincoln @traders Whoops, I flubbed that note. I meant to say that I would resolve YES--I'll extend the market a day given any confusion I may have caused, and not trade myself.
@PoliticalEconomyPK The source they cite for that proposition actually says that she announced her intention to resign.