🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ949 | |
| 2 | Ṁ725 | |
| 3 | Ṁ589 | |
| 4 | Ṁ223 | |
| 5 | Ṁ191 |
Also, was above 70 according to CoinMarketCap
@GautamRishi Resolves YES, since you didn't specify a source of information?
@AmmonLam https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/m7quqv/comment/grdrltb
CMC and coingecko likely use a different set of exchanges and methodology to calculate the price. Given in times of high volatility, prices for the same crypto on different exchanges can actually differ wildly. This is why arbitrage bots exist to take advantage of this which helps equalize the price across exchanges.
Directly from CMC website:
"The price of any cryptoasset is a volume weighted average of market pair prices for the cryptoasset. The higher percentage of volume contributed from the pair, the more influence it has on the average price. The rationale for using a weighted average is because in general, markets with higher volume have higher liquidity and are less prone to price fluctuations. Some prices are manually excluded from the average, denoted by an asterisk () on the markets tab if the price does not seem indicative of a free market price; for example, when an exchange disables withdrawals or deposits, or regulatory conditions make it impossible for anyone else outside of a certain geographical region to buy coins. Some prices are also automatically excluded when our algorithms detect that the reported price is a significant outlier when compared to other market pairs for the same cryptoasset, denoted by three asterisks (**) on the markets
tab."
By the sources above it has traded above 70,000 already, since the question didn't supply a source it would make sense to include volatile trading.
@ii The answer is not that complicated, we ping the creator and ask him specify a source (and he could specify that surpassing 70,000 on any source would count)
Of course this is bad behavior of the creator to not give details and also did not respond to comments in the market.