I will check the "Positions" tab sorting by profits to resolve it.
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ1,013 | |
2 | Ṁ185 | |
3 | Ṁ134 | |
4 | Ṁ68 | |
5 | Ṁ56 |
@Stralor every few minutes is totally different, often swinging between being in favor of YES or NO
@JimHays I was sooo worried about this happening. I think you overshot. There was a position around 55% where YESes would have it
@Stralor maybe we called it too early and my side is the one who lost! or if they keep shifting like this, maybe we'll all just nod and settle on N/A. weird stuff going on here
This is potentially paradoxical, no? Suppose there are 10 NO bettors and 1 YES bettor. If you resolve YES, there is 1 winner and 10 losers so you should have resolved NO. But if you resolve NO, the are 10 winners and 1 loser so it should have resolved YES.
The situation isn't much better if there are more YES bettors than NO. In that case whichever way you resolve is a self justifying.
Or have I misunderstood something?
@Fion the key here it the timing. It will be resolved by the positions at closing. It may occur that winners became losers after that.
@FranklinBaldo ah, I think I understand. So a "winner" is somebody with positive profits at close, not somebody who "wins" in the actual market?