Resolution Criteria

This market resolves via poll. Traders will vote on which characterization(s) of piracy best apply, with resolution determined by aggregate trader voting. Multiple answers may resolve yes if traders believe piracy can be accurately described by multiple frameworks simultaneously (e.g., both "Context-dependent" and "Legally impermissible").

Background

Piracy—unauthorized copying and distribution of copyrighted material—exists at the intersection of law, ethics, and economics. Legal status varies by jurisdiction and content type. Ethical assessments differ based on factors like creator compensation, access barriers, and individual circumstances. Economic impacts are debated: some argue piracy harms creators and industries, while others contend it reflects market failures in pricing or availability.

Considerations

This question asks for normative judgments rather than factual outcomes. The provided answers span different evaluative frameworks (legal, ethical, economic, philosophical, social) that may not be mutually exclusive. A single instance of piracy could simultaneously be "legally impermissible," "context-dependent," and "economically unjustified" depending on the framework applied. Traders should consider whether they're evaluating piracy in general or specific scenarios.