At market close fairly random will roll a d100 and resolve to the number rolled as a percent.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ1 | |
| 2 | Ṁ1 | |
| 3 | Ṁ0 | |
| 4 | Ṁ0 | |
| 5 | Ṁ0 |
People are also trading
@firstuserhere it seems like they already have people making limit ordering, but imma go with yes, high numbers are coolio
@firstuserhere like the logic and stuff. Cuz i don't think betting in a single market is a good strategy, and i see @Catnee putting limit orders around 50, at 48/52
@firstuserhere I asked google for a random number between 1 and 2. If it's 1 I buy NO, if it's 2 I buy YES. The rest doesn't really matter because the chance will probably always be around 50%
@DesTiny You're trying to generate a value from 0-40 or 60-100 in a single roll?
You can do the equivalent by rolling 0-81 and then add 19 if it's 41 or higher.
Or the method you used below would also work fine. There shouldn't be any bias on the seeds as long as you trust SHA256, which is a very widely used and reliable crypto algorithm.
@DesTiny This method might alter the chances of different numbers being chosen, but idk
@DesTiny sounds good, only thing is, might roll another one to decide which range to calculate a rand number from, first. Like 0-40 or 60-100, which one gets a random number first
@DesTiny idk how this bot is calculating random numbers. So, always getting the first number from 0-40 and second number from 60-100 over time (maybe?) Might create a bias if this isn't truly random
@DesTiny Yeah would it be better to choose if its going to be over or below 50% and then randomly take a number between the interval?
@DesTiny not a bias per say, but there'll be a pattern of seed generation. Hardly anything that'd matter for markets anyway, and it'd prolly not have an effect on precision