🏅 Top traders

This can resolve YES, right?

Tound 0 by LivInTheLookingGlass.
Tound 9 by NcyRocks.
Tound 0 by Tetraspace.
Tound 0 by KevinBurke.
Tound 0 by CodeandSolder.
Tound 0 by MatthewBarnett.
Tound 1 by MartinRandall.
Tound 2 by BoltonBailey.
Tound 78 by evergreenemily.
Tound 0 by NathanpmYoung.
Tound 0 by Joshua.
Tound 0 by TheSkeward.
Tound 0 by itsTomekK.
Tound 0 by Manifold.
Tound 0 by WieDan.
Tound 0 by JosephNoonan.
Tound 0 by egroj.
Tound 0 by SirCryptomind.
Tound 0 by Jacy.
Tound 0 by memestiny.
Tound 0 by Stralor.
Tound 0 by NuñoSempere.
Tound 30 by MarcusAbramovitch.
Tound 0 by MichaelWheatley.
Tound 0 by a.
Tound 0 by BTE.
Tound 1 by dreev.
Tound 0 by SneakySly.
Tound 0 by dglid.
Tound 0 by LarsDoucet.
Tound 9 by jack.
Tound 1 by Gen.
Tound 0 by AndrewG.
Tound 0 by jskf.
Tound 0 by Eliza.
Tound 0 by NoaNabeshima.
Tound 0 by CarsonGale.
Tound 1 by Gabrielle.
Tound 0 by PeterWildeford.
Tound 0 by Duncn.
Tound 0 by ScottLawrence.
Tound 0 by MattP.
In total 132.

@DanMan314 thanks! Feel free to DM me on Discords in the future, I'm short on time to be here recently

@DanMan314 Not debating resolution, but your code probably has a bug somewhere. Eliza has resolved a lot of markets. One such market as counterexample.

Will Manifold rename the Trustworthy.ish badge in 2023?

Resolved YES. Based upon my understanding of the criteria evaluated when considering someone for a badge, the title is somewhat of a misnomer, notwithstanding the "ish" qualifier. Considerations for the badge, to my understanding are multifaceted and include things such as: Making markets Correctly resolving markets Contributing to the community via - High quality markets - Thoughtful participation on Discord - Helping with coding/debugging - Tagging problems in Manifold - ect. Generally being represtative of something that Manifold would like to encourage. Trustworthiness is certainly one aspect, but it is not the only aspect. It may be possible to get a badge for other contributions besides trustworthiness. Granted I do believe if you are outed as untrustworthy you won't get or will lose the badge.

@SavioMak Eliza was not Trustworthy-ish back then and the list is hardcoded, plus it only looks for "unresolved markets policy", It should be a reasonable lower bound and as the resolution is YES I think we're fine

@SavioMak just to make surer refactored the code to be less stupid, updated the list and used a more strict phrase "moderation permissions to resolve this market on behalf of the creator", results:
9 by jack,

1 by dreev,

1 by MartinRandall,

1 by Conflux,

9 by NcyRocks,

2 by BoltonBailey,

1 by Gabrielle,

29 by MarcusAbramovitch,

78 by evergreenemily,

1 by Gen,

11 by IsaacKing,

In total 143.

While currently market history shows Moderator resolutions directly it is not accurate for older markets but the margin is large and in the safe direction so I think it's fine

@CodeandSolder I mean I have made 0 bets in this market, and the only one betting NO is acc. I also argee that the code is undercounting. Kudos for double checking though

@SavioMak no offense taken, I have an unhealthy dedication to epistemic purity anyway and the changes took ~5 lines of code :D

My script currently finds 87:
9 by jack.

31 by evergreenemily.

11 by IsaacKing.

23 by MarcusAbramovitch.

1 by dreev.

1 by MartinRandall.

1 by Gabrielle.

9 by NcyRocks.

1 by Conflux.

@CodeandSolder I am officially a slacker

@MartinRandall that is out of 38 eligible users lol

I think I'm up to around 25. You can check my commenting history to get an exact count.

@IsaacKing in retrospect those numbers were way too low, though verifying higher would be very impractical, it is what it is. Could you comment when you've done 100 too?

@CodeSolder I don't really want to keep track of them all unless I'm getting something in return

@CodeandSolder you should mostly be able to use the API to search for the comments since they're meant to follow a format.