Do you agree with strong epistemic modesty?
16
88
Never closes
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
Do you agree with the idea of epistemic modesty as defined here:
In virtually all cases, the credence you hold for any given belief should be dominated by the balance of credences held by your epistemic peers and superiors. One’s own convictions should weigh no more heavily in the balance than that of one other epistemic peer.
Get Ṁ600 play money
Related questions
Will philosophers accept or lean towards consequentialism once a consensus on normative ethics is reached?
58% chance
Will philosophers accept or lean towards virtue ethics once a consensus on normative ethics is reached?
26% chance
By 2050, will informed people significantly reduce their belief in the extent of free will they possess?
52% chance
In a year from today, will I have a satisfactory framework for describing the epistemology of AI alignment?
38% chance
Will the percentage of philosophers identifying as religious in the next PhilPapers Survey decrease?
83% chance
Will the majority of physicists accept Strong Anthropic Principle as the most likely solution for fine tuning?
Will someone strengthen our Goodhart's Law result?
12% chance
What's an unconventional opinion or idea that you've encountered which most people might not agree with? [FREE RESPONSE]
Will philosophers accept or lean towards deontology once a consensus on normative ethics is reached?
11% chance
Am I Intellectually Dishonest? [Permanent]
Ṁ208