Someone will be recognized by the chair to speak and then will make an objection to a certificate of election

Someone will be recognized by the chair to speak and then will make an objection to a certificate of election but be gaveled down by the chair without the chair ruling on whether the objection should be entertained

Someone will be recognized by the chair to speak and then will make an objection to a certificate of the election but the chair will not entertain the objection because the objection is not in writing

Someone will make an objection to a certificate of the election but the chair will not entertain the objection because the objection is not signed by the necessary number of members of Congress

An objection to the certificate of election for a state is entertained, and the House in the Senate consider it separately

The House votes to sustain an objection to a certificate of election

The Senate votes to sustain an objection to a certificate of election

Either house votes to sustain an objection to a certificate of election

An objection to a certificate of election is sustained by both houses

Someone will be recognized by the chair to speak and then will make an objection to a certificate of election but but the objection won't be entertained by the chair without the chair stating a reason

This question regards what will happen in the January 6 joint session of Congress for the purposes of counting the electoral vote. The statements of the chair will resolve the markets regarding what will happen with respect to the decisions of the chair and the congressional record will resolve what happened with regard to the proceedings of either house. The statement of the chair regarding the reasoning for not entertaining an objection will be conclusive, regardless of evidence or documents later produced that an objection did meet one of the requirements.