EG "make me a 120 minute Star Trek / Star Wars crossover". It should be more or less comparable to a big-budget studio film, although it doesn't have to pass a full Turing Test as long as it's pretty good. The AI doesn't have to be available to the public, as long as it's confirmed to exist.
People are also trading

https://www.reddit.com/r/aivideo/comments/1txpkvn/were_getting_a_multimillion_dollar_greenlight_to/
some bigger projects getting announced
@0xseraphim fair point on the price, considerably cheaper. But it's so disappointing that it's learned to do bad CGI
Like, Flow is from 2024 and was made on a budget of 3.5 million euros in Blender

But that's not photorealistic CGI. Would have to look at examples like Polar Express (2004) (165 million dollars) and Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within (2001) (137 million dollars) for more photorealistic examples, and even then it's way off
@0xseraphim definitely concede the point on price. If this were a market on whether AI will displace classical CGI by 2028 I'd be buying yes!

if we take their 400k number for May 2026 then we overshootin'
@DavidBolin evidently. But what's done manually on date X can be usually be done fully-automated on date X+12 months
@0xseraphim hmm, will people want to bet enormous inference bills on a single prompt for a whole movie? Why would you build or run a system like that? If it cost hundreds then sure, but otherwise why half-ass the prompting on millions of dollars?
@Tomoffer if people are willing to spend 10M dollars per movie with your tool, how much are you willing to spend on a marketing project for that tool?





