Same market but with resolution at the end of 2023:

Gaza is currently, in a "de facto" sense, governed by Hamas. The organization's foreign policy has led to blockades by all neighboring countries. Given this situation as my baseline perspective, I intend to evaluate the market based on Israel meeting most of the criteria in the list below by the end of the year, or other indications that would lead a reasonable person to infer that Israel as complete control over the territory. I will employ my own judgment, supplemented by input from other stakeholders, in cases where there is ambiguity.

This list was added here to elucidate some people who were arguing that israel already had control of Gaza at the begining of the conflict. It as generated lots of controversy and apprehension in the betters. It serves as a guide and not as a checkbox I will be strictly following at resolution time. if there is still something I should further clarify please add some more comments. I am trying to go by some sort of common sense definition of political (not only military) control, including being able to defend and provide for the population in an organized and CONTROLLED faction.

"De Facto" Control Over a Territory implies: 

: The ability to make and enforce laws [while allowing citizen participation in decision-making processes (this is optional)].

: Ensuring internal safety and defending against external threats, while regulating who comes in and out of the territory.

: Providing essential services like healthcare, education, and utilities such as water and electricity.

: Control over financial systems, including tax collection and monetary policy.

5) International and Environmental Relations

: Maintaining international relationships, disaster preparedness, and resource management.

Possibilities that have generated confusion and their resolution:

1) Distopic military dictatorship style control, resolves YES.

In this case criteria only the citizen participation section of criteria 1 would not be enforced.

2) Terror attacks by Hamaz are happening in a otherwhise controlled territory, resolves YES

In this case the internal safety section of criteria 2 would be lacking but everything else would still lead me to resolve it as YES.

3) Hamaz having a section of Gazan territory still in its control, resolves NO.

4) Population self governing (with or without IDF present), resolves NO.

5) Population in anarchy (with or without IDF present), resolves NO.

Also I should refer that at the end I will look for information on wikipedia, major news outlets and other similar reputable sources to make my decision. I will also take into consideration market discussions in case of possible ambiguities.