TikTok Inc. v. Merrick Garland (TikTok Ban) 

United States v. Skrmetti (ban on transgender health care for minors)

KalshiEX LLC v. CFTC (ban on prediction markets for elections)

U.S. and Plaintiff States v. Google LLC (Google antitrust case)

Food and Drug Administration v. Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC (E-cigarette supreme court case)

Federal Trade Commission, et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (Amazon antitrust case)

U.S and Plaintiff States v. Apple Inc. (Apple antitrust case)

United States v. Binance Holdings (charges against Binance for iolating several laws, including the Bank Secrecy Act, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, and the Commodity Exchange Act)

Federal Trade Commission v. Microsoft Corp. and Activision Blizzard, Inc (Attempt to block Microsoft's merger/acquisition of Activision Blizzard)

United States v. Meta Platforms, Inc. (alleging a violation of the fair housing act by Meta)

Clarke v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (PredictIt Case)

The Department of Justice (DOJ) maintains numerous high-profile cases across antitrust, financial regulation, and tech sectors. There is historical precedent for the DOJ dropping cases during presidential transitions, particularly when they align with new administration priorities or face policy constraints.

A case will be considered "dropped" if any of the following occur during Trump's presidency:

The market will resolve separately for each case listed. Cases that will resolve No are those that are:

If the United States drops its original position before Trump takes office, that case will resolve as N/A.

Note: a market can resolve to yes even if the case continues for any reason (such as a private party or state government maintaining the litigation). The only thing that matters for the purposes of this market is whether the United States government abandoned its position.