data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12c99/12c99c78b076bb0d3d3f1e5a72346a9f3dc18cc1" alt=""
Background
Scapegoating - the practice of blaming a person or group for problems not entirely of their making - often intensifies during periods of social, economic, or political stress. Historical patterns show that vulnerable or minority groups are frequently targeted, especially during election cycles or times of national difficulty.
Resolution Criteria
This market will resolve based on which group(s), if any, face significant, widespread scapegoating in March 2025. Resolution will be determined by:
Prominent political figures, media outlets, or influential public voices consistently blaming the specified group for major societal problems
Demonstrable increase in negative rhetoric or policy proposals targeting the group
Measurable uptick in mainstream media coverage documenting the scapegoating of the group
Multiple answers can resolve as YES if multiple groups face significant scapegoating during this period.
The market will resolve NO for any group if:
The scapegoating is isolated to fringe groups or individuals without significant public influence
The criticism of the group is based on specific, factual policy disagreements rather than broad blame for societal issues
The group faces general discrimination (long standing) but not specific scapegoating for broader problems
Considerations
March 2025 falls within the lead-up to the 2024 U.S. presidential election aftermath, which could influence scapegoating narratives
International events (e.g., geopolitical tensions, economic challenges) may affect which groups become targets
Historical patterns suggest scapegoating often increases during periods of economic uncertainty or political transition
Social media and rapid information spread can amplify scapegoating narratives more quickly than in previous eras
Possible clarification from creator (AI generated):
Multiple groups can resolve as YES simultaneously if they each meet the resolution criteria
Who will be Q1 2025’s most prominent scapegoat?
Multiple answers can resolve as YES if multiple groups face significant scapegoating during this period.
The title seems to imply only one will resolve yes, while the description says it could be multiple
The market will resolve N/A for any group if:
The scapegoating is isolated to fringe groups or individuals without significant public influence
The criticism of the group is based on specific, factual policy disagreements rather than broad blame for societal issues
The group faces general discrimination but not specific scapegoating for broader problems
I'm assuming this is a typo and meant to resolve no in these cases? Otherwise it's impossible to resolve no and is effectively asking "conditional on it happening, will it happen?"
@TheAllMemeingEye it can be multiple, the title is limited in length and descriptiveness, I’m not quite sure what you mean by the second one but I have adjusted the description in a way that might be more clear.
it can be multiple, the title is limited in length and descriptiveness
Do you think a more accurate title might be "Which of these groups will be subject to significant scapegoating in Q1 2025"?
I’m not quite sure what you mean by the second one
The bullet pointed n/a criteria sound like things that one would expect to cause a no resolution, and there is no mention in the description of what would indeed trigger a no resolution